bkoganbing
Some sharp eyed previous reviewer caught the same thing I did, that Steel Against The Sky is a remake of the Cagney/O'Brien classic The Irish In Us. Warner Brothers more than most recycled a lot of their most other studios their previous film.The action shifts from the slums of The Lower East Side of New York across the country to the Pacific coast where a bridge that looks a lot like the unfinished Golden Gate is going up. The Evans family are a family of bridge builders specializing in the very highest points of those suspension bridges being constructed. Edward Ellis who was injured on the job brought his three sons up in the same trade. The boys are Lloyd Nolan who is a foreman, amiable lunkhead Edward Brophy, and Craig Stevens who is looking for an easier and softer way to make a living.Both Nolan and Stevens fall for the big boss Gene Lockhart's daughter Alexis Smith and upon that rests the rest of the story.I have to say that Warner Brothers edited the footage of the construction of the Golden Gate Bridge well into the plot. The concern is that the construction of the bridge will be delayed and it's building is part of our national defense program. The fact that Steel Against The Sky was released a week after Pearl Harbor must have made the ticket buying public a bit apprehensive at so timely a remark.Probably the most important thing to come out of Steel Against The Sky was the marriage of Alexis Smith and Craig Stevens in real life.Not a bad film from Warner Brothers B picture unit.
MartinHafer
As long as you don't have overly high expectations, "Steel Against the Sky" is a pretty decent film. However, it clearly is a B-movie--with a relatively predictable plot. But, it's enjoyable and well made for what it is, so it's worth a peek--particularly if you like Bs.The plot for this film is VERY similar to another Warner Brothers film ALSO from 1941! It's odd that two such alike films were made a short time apart. Both feature manly guys working in very dangerous jobs at very great heights (in "Manpower" it's power lines, in "Steel Against the Sky" it's bridge construction), both feature two men fighting over the same woman, both feature a guy ASSUMING the woman loves him even though there really isn't that much evidence and both feature a falling out--and a conclusion where all is forgiven and everyone is friends once again."Steel Against the Sky" features three ODDLY cast brothers (Lloyd Nolan, Eddie Brophy and Craig Stevens). The oldest (Nolan) is the foreman on bridge projects who is in love with the owner's (Gene Lockhart) daughter (Alexis Smith). However, the younger and seemingly irresponsible brother (Stevens) and the lady fall in love. They don't want to hurt the older brother's feelings--and when he learns, YES, his feelings are very hurt and there is a falling out between them.In addition to this plot, the film features some comic relief from the Professor (Walter Catlett) and a TINY cameo by a young Jackie Gleason as an amiable drunk. Worth seeing and if you do watch, pay attention to Lockhart--he gets a chance to do some nice acting in a supporting role.
Michael_Elliott
Steel Against the Sky (1941)** (out of 4) Boring mix of soap, comedy and melodrama has Lloyd Nolan playing Rocky Evans, a tough bridge builder who falls in love with the boss's daughter (Alexis Smith) but she ends up falling for his younger brother (Craig Stevens), which causes problems back at home. Warner will always be remembered for their gangster movies but they also did quite a few films that shined a spotlight on blue collar workers and this here would seem like a good subject but sadly everything is pretty much wasted for nothing. The entire film has a very weird pace and feel to it as we're dealing with dangerous situations where men are risking their lives to build these bridges and skyscrapers. That's fine but then it's mixed with some downright bizarre comedy and most of it dealing with a professor who the younger brother takes in in order to try and make some quick money. This stuff with the professor is just so unfunny but what's worse is that there's never any real reason for it to be here. The love triangle aspect doesn't work either because we're basically just told the situations of who loves who and we're never given any scenes where we believe what we're seeing. Nolan makes for a good leading man and I thought he was quite believable as the tough brother. Smith is as beautiful as ever but the screenplay gives her nothing to do. Stevens isn't too bad as the brother but he suffers from the same weak story. Gene Lockhart plays the boss and Walter Catlett appears as the professor. Jackie Gleason has a very small but memorable bit. STEEL AGAINST THE SKY could have been a good movie but the comedy needed to be dropped all together and the clichéd drama needed a major rewrite.
xerses13
STEEL AGAINST THE SKY (1941) is one of Warner Brothers (W.B.) 'Working Man' pictures. This time featuring the building of a bridge. While building the bridge, competing Brothers vie for the affection of a comely young lass. The Brothers are Rocky Evans (Lloyd Nolan) -vs- Chuck (Craig Stevens) both with eyes on Helen Powers (Alexis Smith). Who wins out, well you should already know if you have seen THE IRISH IN US (1935).Yes, S.A.T.S is T.I.I.U. recycled just six (6) years later. In that picture Pat O'Brien (Pat O'Hara) is out-pointed by James Cagney (Danny) for hand of the beautiful Lucille Jackson (Olivia De Havilland). The differences, rather then build bridges we have the Police. Instead of a eccentric inventor as Chuck Evan's protégé we have Cagney's Boxer, Carbarn Hammerschlog (Allen Jenkins). The remake, a gruff lovable Father 'Pop' Evans (Edward Ellis), the original a sweet and 'oh' so Irish Mother 'Ma' (Mary Gordon).This is not the first or the last time the W.B. and all the other studios would recycle plots going back to there original 'Silent' incarnations. Some will even use the same exact footage. Which can be really jarring. Example, THE CROWD ROARS (1932) became INDIANAPOLIS SPEEDWAY (1939). Do you think in seven (7) years both the Cars and Women's fashions would be noticeably different? Yes they are, but it did get the picture made quickly, under budget and profitable.
AD
