Lars Lendale
***************** SPOILERS **************If you're 14 years old and you've never seen a softcore porn movie on your own before, then that might be the only exception to this condition for liking this movie.That movie is a copy of the first one, yet it manages to be boring and mediocre. Same plot twists, same concept, same town, same school. How can they do that in the same school ? !A ton of plot holes, a ton of events that are not possible - such as Britney not getting caught, who's in charge of laundering the money ? Because it's only a company check, so who's in charge of wiring the money to an account ? Hw can Britney use this money if the company check is signed to Maya ? How can Britney pay off a tenant of a aerodrome without any money on her account ? How can the police not investigate on the missing Julian Hayes ? How can the police not check that Britney checked out exactly at the same aerodrome Niles crashed the plane ? How can Bridge come to the conclusion that the girls murdered Hayes ? How can Britney have nightmares of her mother's suicide when she is actually still alive ? A sequel as uninspired as this, is unacceptable. The cast is a TV second tier actors, the girls are hot but they hardly ever show much of their bodies, the sex scenes are laughable with doubles, a real rip offs. Seriously this is 2004 and you come up with the exact same erotic scene ? Wow, a real rip-offs, a few kisses here and there, a guy in his boxer shorts, what is this ? The only performance worth mentioning is Washington. Other than that, very forgettable movie.
BA_Harrison
Wild Things 2 isn't a sequel; it's a cheap emulation, an imperfect carbon-copy that takes nearly all of the elements from the first film and simply replays them with a slightly modified script and a different (ie., less memorable) cast. As in the original, the noir-style plot revolves around a group of morally bankrupt characters out to get rich any way they can, meaning that double-crosses, murder, and sex are once again the order of the day, all of which leaves the viewer with a very strong feeling of deja-vu.Bisexual rich girl/poor girl combo: it's there! Gratuitous threesome scene: it's there! Sexy pool scene: it's there! Inquisitive detective: he's there! Further plot explanations during the end credits: you guessed it... it's all bloody there, with zero effort made to add anything new. The no-name cast do their best with the regurgitated material, and the girls are plenty hot enough to make matters easy to endure, but at the end of the day, this is nothing more than an unimaginative cash-in that really didn't need to be made.5/10 for all the lesbian snogging and boobs and stuff, but that's being generous.
vineeth002
I watched the movie last month. It's an excellent movie with suspense and surprise at every moment. The strarring of my favourite actress Susan wards is so amazing (Besides she's beautiful too). The director of the movie needs an equal appreciation. I hope more sequel of wild things will be made.Another thing is its back ground music. The back ground music that is heard in the beginning of the movie and at the end. So pretty......... The ending is also nice. The end reveals how the robbery is planned.. So very bad for those who leave the chair upon seeing the credits. They miss the 'important part'.
tysonhollen
I thought this movie was going to be different than the original one but it seems to be a cheesy B-List copy in almost every way.It contains the same plot as the first Wild Things.The actors and the characters they play look like,act and talk almost identical to the characters in the original.They chose Susan Ward for the Denise Richards spoiled-rich girl role because she looks like Richards.They chose Joe Michael Burke for the Matt Dillion town-respected city worker role because he looks like Dillion and they chose Linden Ashby for the Kevin Bacon obsessed cop role because he looks like Bacon.The only difference between this one and the original is that in this one the rich girl gets the money and the poor girl dies,where a in the first movie the poor girl gets the cash and the rich girl dies.This movie is very predictable after the first fifteen minutes. Calling this piece of trash a great flick is blasphemy.I only rent this one when I can't find anything else to rent. My advice is go and rent the original not this one or wild things 3 either.
AD
