Andron

Andron

2016 "Only one survives"
Andron
Andron

Andron

2.7 | 1h40m | R | en | Action

A group of people are plunged into a dark, claustrophobic maze, where they must fight to survive, as the outside world watches.

View More
AD

WATCH FREEFOR 30 DAYS

All Prime Video
Cancel anytime

Watch Now
2.7 | 1h40m | R | en | Action , Science Fiction | More Info
Released: June. 03,2016 | Released Producted By: AMBI Group , Country: United Kingdom Budget: 0 Revenue: 0 Official Website: http://ambidistribution.com/titles?title=Andron
Synopsis

A group of people are plunged into a dark, claustrophobic maze, where they must fight to survive, as the outside world watches.

...... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Cast

Alec Baldwin , Michelle Ryan , Danny Glover

Director

Chris Bonello

Producted By

AMBI Group ,

AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.

Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

blee0744 I saw this movie for free, and I still overpaid. Alec Baldwin is, once again, a ham sandwich on two legs. Add the insufferable Danny Glover and you would think things couldn't get worse. But wait....poor photography, choppy editing, poor acting and corny dialog all contribute to making this a giant stink-burger.
douglaswhidden I feel like most reviewers didn't actually understand the film; yes, it feels a bit derivative and clichéd, but that may be intentional, once the twist is revealed. This film is clearly a direct social commentary on current economic and media trends, and the film's close makes it amply evident that the viewer is not merely a viewer but a participant in the whole process, or network, or system, etc. Not the finest acting or sets or effects, and pacing was spotty, but I enjoyed the payoff, if one can call it that. Granted, maybe a lot of build-up for that payoff, but it was entirely necessary given the premise. Sorry if this is vague, but I'm trying to tread the spoiler line while actually commenting on the purpose of the film :) Don't have great expectations, but an intellectually and socially interesting message.
Dani A good film. Especially if you're looking for a distopian Sci fi to fill you're time. Minus the performance of Danny Glover.The special effects made it look as though he was cut & pasted onto the screen. The overall acting is good and draws you in. It's worth a watch. Especially to see some familiar actors in the movie. I didn't watch it because of Alec Baldwin.The movies pace picks up towards the middle. At the end it leaves you guessing and wanting more. There's a scene in the credits so keep watching till the very end.
midge56 This is what happens when you hire a foreign director who can't speak English and therefore can't communicate with his cast. He was on the DVD extras. Since he didn't understand a word he was filming, how could he make a decent movie or anticipate what the English speaking cast or audience would like? I have not seen hunger games, etc, so I'm not judging this movie by comparison. However, this so-called labyrinth looked like they were filming in an abandoned power plant. I sure hope it wasn't a nuke plant for the sake of the actors. It wouldn't be the first time a director exposed his entire cast to radiation & they ended up with cancer. (Howard Hughes; The Conqueror film with John Wayne, Hayward, Moorehead & 90 others got cancer from filming in the Utah desert downwind near the Nevada nuclear test site). The control room & cooling towers & water systems in this Andron film sure looked like an old nuclear power plant. Oblivion (a movie I loved, was partially filmed in an abandoned power plant in New Orleans. It was not nuclear as far as I know but was leaking water all over the cast, crew & equipment while filming Oblivion. These abandoned power plants are pretty awful. Wet, rusting, dangerous, crumbling, possibly toxic and are rotten locations to use for filming. But they come cheap.I gave Andron 3 stars because I actually loved the few glimpses of the futuristic city. One of the best future cities I've seen. Too bad more of the movie wasn't filmed there using a different plot. Gleaming glass future cities would have been a much better theme.Baldwin & Glover should have reversed their roles. This is not a racial statement. It's a personality observation. Baldwin would have done much better as the asinine Chancellor with Glover as the game Host. It was also in bad taste to show Glover owning a slave. He was clearly uncomfortable.I agree the ridiculously oversized office the size of the French Palace with a single desk & CG screens & controls in the air was indeed absurd. It reminded me of the oversized, empty CG sets on the V 2009 TV reboot series. There should have been more technology & a place for Baldwin's assistant to sit instead of her walking across a football stadium sized room in a rubber suit every time he wanted to have her perform a task. (like ST:Voyager's 7 of 9).There was the total lack of logic behind the plot. 9 Billion killed in a catastrophe caused by this handful of corporations running the world. Using the games as a way to thin out the remaining 2 billion slave population they couldn't feed by encouraging them to bet their lives on which of the 10 contenders would win; & die if they picked a loser.The lack of logic is where they claim they can't feed the 2 billion surviving slaves. They should have the slaves plowing & planting crops & orchards & process fish & food production instead of sitting around, filth encrusted, watching games. 2 billion slave laborers can do a lot to produce food & the privileged few elite would not need to kill off their labor force. These few elite leaders were clearly Not smart. It also made no sense why their slaves were filthy & living in squalor since the gleaming city of glass spread as far as you could see. So plenty of available room & technology for their slave laborers. Also, if they killed off all the slaves, these elite idiots would have to do their own work. Somehow, this population thinning reminds me of the Georgia guide stone. NWOThen we are stuck watching these actors in their young 20's, who have no memories of who & what they are; wandering around this nasty abandoned power plant, doing stupid things & getting picked off; one by one by trick walls & glowing eyed robots. Victims too stupid to stick together or fashion weapons & too stupid to not leave any weapons lying around. The females (except 2) stand there looking stupid while the guys are pounded trying to bare hand fight robots.I wouldn't chastise the acting skills of this cast. They were young actors mostly in their early 20's. Even famous actors often started doing low budget flicks to pay the bills & get experience. Some of the older actors do the same. Remember Clint Eastwood's spaghetti westerns?The problems on this film were a rotten writer and a rotten director who couldn't communicate with his cast. But they all had to praise him in order to get hired by others.The best way to watch this is with your finger on the fast forward button. Go normal speed whenever you see Baldwin, Glover, the future world or the bald black female because she has the entire plot in her dialogue & acting. Also, go to normal speed whenever they are outside. Otherwise, just fast forward. The victims don't know who they are or what they are doing there, so you won't miss much.I usually fast forward through any battles or fights on any movie. There is no value in watching mindless violence no matter how fancy the special effects may be. I have no desire to watch faces punched in. Also, how many laser, sword or gunshots do you have to see? They all look the same. It is boring. I would much rather see sci-fi, high tech & intelligent interaction & fresh new story lines like the film Oblivion with Tom Cruise & Morgan Freeman.As I said, the futuristic city is the best part of this film. Have your fast forward ready for the rest as I described.