utahman1971 I am giving a 10 anyways. Why because still the dummies that review on this site still don't get it. THE VOTING, WHEN DOING THE REVIEW GIVES THE RATINGS. DUH! There is so many reviews that are not voted, and so the rating stays either higher or lower than it really should be. Why? Because, of what I started to say about people being stupid and not voting, when they review the movie. Who cares if you say it was certain stars out of 5 or 10. That has nothing to do towards the ratings on this site.God, I swear there are people that should not be let out, and locked up for good. This just proves it. Just for being dumb. So I see this movie is rated at 5.1 at around 30 reviews. Obvious, it is because of the no votes. I have read a lot of the reviews, and they are putting movie down without the vote, which means that 5.1 rating on it will not move down.That is how stupid it is. So the next few people that don't vote, and it gets a ton that do vote for it as good the rating goes up. Same vice versa to go down instead of up. It is not hard to vote people. It is right there when you review the movie. I mean, how can you miss it? It is right at the beginning of adding your review.Sorry, I come bluntly saying your dumb, but if you don't want to look stupid, then don't be. This site is pissing me off for not making the vote a mandatory thing, when reviewing the movie. It totally screws up the rating of the movies to either too low or way too high for a crap movie or a good movie that it made to look like crap.I will keep adding this to my reviews until the owners or moderators of this site or developers decide to make this right. It is not that hard to do things right. So think before you do something. I know its really hard for you to do it, but do it anyways.I can't believe it anymore, if a movie is really bad or good any more from these reviews. Cause, the ratings are messed up bad. Fix it, OK. I know you might be cutting out the people that reviewed already that did not vote, but if you did this the whole rating system would be better.

Scarecrow-88 Several strikes against Chromeskull: Laid to Rest II. First, the casting of Brian Austin Green immediately had me groaning intensely inside. No, more like nauseated. I can't stand this 90210 pretty boy trying his hand as a Chromeskull disciple who works for the plot's ludicrous "The Organization", I guess a certain type of covert kill-happy operation that delights in the recording of pretty girls as they are tortured, begging for mercy while the psychopath quietly enjoys his handiwork. Most of the time they are trapped in coffins, crying, pleading, wanting to be freed from this terror, falling on deaf ears. Another strike is the rampant stupidity on display, how the main lead killer seems indestructible. How can such damage to a face and head sustained by the Laid to Rest psycho not lead to his demise? The opening facial reconstruction (including skin graft and eyeball surgery) reminded me of Chucky the Doll's repair in Child's Play 3, to use another embarrassingly ridiculous rebirth of a killer. It is hard to accept any of this without laughing, and if the tone of Laid to Rest II wasn't at times so serious (the lead detective of the most inept police task force I've seen in a thriller in quite some time tries to console the kidnapped final slasher heroine's distraught mother, mentioning he himself has a daughter and will do all he can to get her back safe and alive) you might could take it all in stride and just roll the eyes, have a drink and popcorn, abandoning all preconceptions of this attempting to be anything other than a 90 minute stab-a-thon. This is that in all its glory. I would definitely reward this sick-in-the-head film a "creative kills" award for if there is a way to savagely butcher a person with a blade, Laid to Rest II delivers in spades. One scene has a poor female cop (and not a bad looker, to boot) pressed, mouth-first (ouch!) into a "spinner blade" stuck in a stair step as she was trying to climb away from wannabe Chrome killer, Austin Green. Green has his own Chromeskull mask he wears, so devoted to his "boss", he has the Skull and Knives tattoo inked to his chest. Yeah, he also enjoys provoking the film's screeching heroine into tears, talking about how his master enjoys slaughtering victims. Nice guy, this Austin Green. I just can't even stand to look at that mug of his. Anyway, Chromeskull gets in on the action later as Detective King's (Owain Yeoman) litter of cops enter his abandoned warehouse which looks like it was ripped from a SAW sequel. Between Austin Green and Nick Principe's mangled-faced monstrosity, a whole police force is massacred in one singular location! There is one cop who is hooked to a type of electrical box and submerged, against his will, into a tank of water as his face begins to peel away before being slammed into the side. A number of familiar faces show up (director Robert Hall has a ton of friends, I guess) in supporting roles like organization member Danielle Harris who has a way with ChromeSkull, Thomas Dekker (a nice young actor I liked in the wrongfully cancelled Terminator series, as Tommy, a "loose end" that needs to be eliminated), Gail O'Grady (NYPD Blue) as the heroine's concerned mother, and Johnathon Schaech (The Forsaken; Prom Night remake) as an enigmatic FBI agent. Harris steps away from her usual sweet-victim roles in these kinds of movies to play a cold-blooded heel bucking for Green's position. She even has a scene where she shaves ChromeSkull's head bald and tells him via Internet communication (Skype, whatever you want to call it) to have fun in Hollywood where he seems to fit right in with the crazies who populate the streets. ChromeSkull's Organization is quite hi-tech and intricately designed, quite efficient like the FBI or CIA; it's just so surreal that this movie asks us to believe in this. The ultimate strike against this is the ugly digital photography and steadi-cam epileptic movement. Saving money for the gore gags, I guess as the director seems to enjoy lavishing slasher fans with opens wounds, severed heads, and lots of blood. One great scene I rejoiced was Green's fate as it is quite gruesome. Dekker deserves better than his part provides and Mimi Michaels spends all her screen time in a frenzied state of horror, shirtless (just a bra), and pleading for her life. Michaels' character is losing her sight, so she tries to negotiate by telling Green she couldn't identify if he'd let her go. Of course, you get the follow-up heckling from Green that is expected from a movie of this type. He really thinks he's a badass in this movie, let me tell you. I just threw up in my mouth a little..

KineticSeoul The first "Laid to Rest" wasn't a great slasher but it was a alright slasher that is passable because of the creative kills with a single weapon. This time the kills are a bit more gruesome for this sequel but it also seemed like they just put in bunch of random character for ChromeSkull to kill. And that basically sums up most of this movie for the most part. If you have a weak stomach though it's just better to stay away from this if you do cause there is almost nothing in the story department. The acting is even more atrocious this time and almost laughable at times than actually makes the premise intimidating. There is more weapons that is used to gruesomely kill people but the only audience I can see really enjoying this movie. Is the audiences that like to watch people die in some of the most gruesome way possible with sharp objects. Although I seen similar movies like this before but even I had to cringe a few times while watching this. Also the mystery behind ChromeSkull is what sort of made the videotaping killer sort of interesting and this movie reveals a bit of ChromeSkull and who he is. I am not sure if this is a good thing but the premise is even more ridiculous this time around. And not only because ChromeSkull manage to survive the first incident, it just makes the killer more supernatural than human. Okay so it is now revealed that ChromeSkull is like some leader in some creepy secret organization. Although it isn't clearly explained what that organization is about. Like I said there is little to no script for this movie and to sum it up, it's a sadistic gruesome killing movie. But there is audiences for this type of movie so if your one of them this movie might be worth a watch with a group of friends that share the same interest. I personally just found this sequel to be gruesome but bland. The movie sort of picks up near the end and than fall short again because it just becomes too ridiculous and stupid.3.8/10

efrainerodriguez-162-774655 Let me start this review by stating that I am an avid horror movie fan for well over 30 years. I read Fangoria magazine, I've even attended the conventions since before they were popular. The reason I state that is that I don't want anyone to think that my bad review of this flick has anything to do with the its nature.Chromeskull - LTR 2 is a brutal film. The kills are creative and very gory (which is great). In addition to that, it was good seeing Brian Austin Green finally acting (he did a terrific job as one of the villains). So what made it so bad? The answer to that question is the entire sloppy concept. The original LTR was nothing short of a slasher classic. It had the brutality and gore of the sequel, but to go with it, it had a great plot, and it might have even been a believable story. It never got boring, and honestly, I recently saw it for about the fifth time and I still could not peel my eyes off the screen. LTR 2 went off on such a distant tangent, it plays out like a "final destination" movie that gets made for the sakes of showing gory kills, yet forgets about plot - much less a good one.Spoiler Time - The ChromeSkull killer is apparently the head of some powerful organization that covers his murders and sets up his kills in a game like style. Green is his enforcer, and this organization can even cover up killing cops (they must be some sort of super crime syndicate) and still going unnoticed. This was strike one (totally unbelievable setup). Strike two is that the original killer seems to come from the Jason Vorhees gene pool, as he is actually saved after his face melted into the mask at the end of the last movie, and the main character bashed his head in with a baseball bat. So they called on Joan River's surgeon, who saves him after having had his head completely flattened (had they brought in Herbert West to reanimate him, this would have been more believable). Meanwhile the movie goes totally cliché, killing off the main starlet from the first movie in the first 5 minutes (we haven't seen that before - have we?) - strike 3! But it gets worse - from there the story falls further apart (Green and Danielle Harris are power playing for control of the organization, the original killer becomes Frankenstein like, a new victim is introduced that you really don't care much for, a new game is setup, Green and killer are also feuding, and the male survivor from the original is also brought in as well). This blended with what has to be the worse police department in the world on the case, you just don't see the terrible ending coming (the director must have hoped the audience was progressively going blind like the main character in this slop of a movie).... There are very ridiculous scenes with cops that are just laughable because Barnie Fife from Mayberry was probably a better cop than the guys in this movie - to make characters this dumb, you're just insulting your audience. At the end of this fiasco, I felt cheated and robbed. Robert Hall took his perfect slasher vision (the first movie) and basically sold out to make a cheap sequel. I honestly still cannot believe just how bad this movie was...