jacobjohntaylor1 This a great movie. This is better then the TV show. This better then the first 9 Star Trek movies. This movie has a great story line. It also has great acting. It very fast past Star Trek IX is better. But still this a great movie. Star Trek into darkness is better. Star Trek beyond is also better. Still this a great movie. See it. It is an awesome.

cinemajesty Movie Review: "Star Trek: Nemesis" (2002)A supreme screenplay by writer John Logan gets unfortunately violated by hopelessly overthrown talented-editor-turns-director for the third-time in an unless successful-career retrieving Stuart Baird, known for editing "Lethal Weapon" (1987) and "007: Casino Royale" (2006) to perfection, to then become somehow a second-choice-felt executive decision at Hollywood major Paramount Pictures for misopportunities in a ready-to-go "Star Trek" universe, which becomes unforgivenly fatal in case of "Nemesis", produced overly-long in season 2001/2002, which had been so carefully prepared by leading actor Patrick Stewart as Captain Picard, who needs to confront a stolen-DNA resurrected nemesis of his own flesh & blood, initiated by Romulan slave-race Uprising, led by playing-his-young-heart Tom Hardy at age 24, letting seemingly as underdwellingly guess of the potential, the young actor, turning-star by 2010, had been in store with a peaking full-frontal starship metal-splintering confrontation booked for in this case sadly missed movie magic moments for the ages between the match-making characters of Picard versus Shinzon from a still uncharted nocturnal, wannabe intergalactic tribe of leeching "Remans".Nevertheless "Star Trek: Nemesis" in its at least twenty minutes of nostalgica-ruling farewells after 15 years of on-screen-service with seven seasons and four motion pictures of mixed receptions, when "First Contact" (1996) must prevail as "Star Trek" Next Generation's landmark alongside with highly-addictive television seasons 3 and 4 (broadcast between 1988 and 1990) to a great crew of "Enterprise NCC 1701-E" surrounding here still-awake as professionally interacting performers with all-up front Brent Spiner as the character of "Data", who finally exceeds its uniquely-received "Artificial Intelligence" to build a look-a-like brother "B-4", when Jonathan Frakes as Commander Riker, who sacrificed the best years of his life in service of "Star Trek" qualities in picture and sound bound by all-through-the 1990s "Star Trek" television continuity assuring producer Rick Berman, who just got entangled in times of substantial change with a massive 60-Million-Dollar production budget for "Star Trek: Nemesis" and the newly-underdeveloped 22nd-century disappointment of a television show plainly called "Star Trek: Enterprise" (2001-2005).© 2018 Felix Alexander Dausend (Cinemajesty Entertainments LLC)

trashgang The last one made with the second generation crew on board of the USS Enterprise. And I must say that it was a good one. I really enjoyed it.Wear as the previous one the characters were laughable and had a lot of love parts this one doesn't. All characters are back in normal condition and the one love scene you will see turns into a nightmare so on that part it's a Star Trek flick. The effects are also much better but it's the story itself that makes it watchable.Nemesis was the end of an era, it took years before a new generation came on board of the Enterprise.Gore 0/5 Nudity 0/5 Effects 3/5 Story 3/5 Comedy 0/5

classicsoncall Though I've been a fan of the original Star Trek TV series and films based on that franchise, I've never been moved to check out any of the spin-off series. This is actually the first look I've ever had at the 'Next Generation' crew, and more than a few decades after the fact. I can't say that I felt anything really new here except for the cast of characters which I'm vaguely familiar with. Having just started wearing hearing aids, I felt a bit like Picard (Patrick Stewart) and Shinzon (Tom Hardy) dealing with Shalaft's Syndrome, in that I'm hearing things I haven't heard in a long time, as even the clacking of the computer keyboard as I write this has an annoying quality to it.The story itself here felt derivative of any number of earlier Star Trek stories - the Enterprise gets into a jam with it's current Commander, and he needs to use all of his experience and wiles to avoid destruction. Picard's opponent Shinzon was originally created with temporal RNA sequencing, but his cellular structure is breaking down because the sequencing was never activated. That seemed like a pretty big oversight to me when I heard it. Everyone knows you have to activate the RNA sequencing in order for the aging process to proceed at an accelerated rate.The bigger problem I had with the story was Picard all of a sudden agreeing to side with Romulan Commander Donatra (Dina Mayer) to go up against Shinzon. What happened to all that wariness against Romulan subterfuge and eons of hostile behavior against the Federation? That didn't seem realistic to me, even if Donatra had her own issues with Shinzon's plan to annihilate the Earth.But the biggest kicker of all was Picard deciding to ram the Romulan vessel Scimitar! What!?!? Seems there could have been a reckless endangerment charge in there someplace for the Captain. Fortunately it all worked out, but what about the repair bill on the Enterprise? You would think that would have amounted to a few sheckels when all was said and done. If only Picard would have downloaded Data's memory engrams into the cloaking device of the Scimitar, he could have lowered the Thaloran radiation level to sixty percent and made a clean sweep of overtaking the ship without all the destruction. Doesn't everybody know that?