Dimitris J. Filippas Overall I liked the movie, but naturally there were some bits that I didn't. I thoroughly enjoyed the plot, although they didn't go too much into why everything was happening. This was explained as 'we have no idea why this is happening, but it is', but by that point it didn't really matter, I just wanted to see some 1357 France.The other thing that I could do without was Kate's acting and constant tripping over air, but other than that the acting was pretty okay. Nostalgia played a big factor in my re-watching of this movie and I didn't regret it. I would recommend it, if you're in the mood for something light and not a movie that takes itself too seriously.

ThomLA I hadn't read the book, but the two sentence pitch synopsis sounded promising. And there was definitely plenty of Hollywod talent involved in all aspects of production. Enough has been said of the things wrong with the film, some other notable impressions are in order. Butler is a standout. As is the brief turn by Sheen. Unfortunately, Walker, who grew to be a very serviceable actor, can show a bit in over his head. O'Connor can deliver key lines with as needed dramatic American flair (better than Thewlis). There is a point after one of their escapes where they're all in a circle panicking and McDonough is really losing it. The ensuing necessary developments and twists progress the plot well. Action sequences are top notch. A little more here, a little less there...could have easily been a much more engaging motion picture.

vancelovett If you're looking to watch a hilarious compilation of time travel tropes, and watch Paul Walker, Gerard Butler and that woman who plays the woman try to make the most boring possible time travel destination in the multiverse (1300s France) exciting, this one is for you. Even the B plot is funny, there's this weird tension between the scientists that makes little sense but is fun to watch. Complete with shirtless Gerard Butler, lack of nitpicky intellectual butterfly effect logic, and portals that are excruciatingly painful, yet avoided in conversation like that time your uncle molested you in a public bathroom. The only thing this movie is missing is a cameo by the artist formerly known as Prince. 10 out of 10 for a 100% worth it watch. You will be a better person after you do so.

MoviesReviews101 Verdict: Not Quite ThereStory: Ever film that is based on time travel tries to find something different to make it stand out, and I will give this one credit. It does pose a different idea to what we are used too, the whole 3D fax machine that creates a wormhole is new but very far-fetched. If we are being honest this story is about saving an old man but sacrificing a group of young men who make the trip back. That alone would ask a few questions really. Most of the support cast are solely there to be killed off which leads to even more questions about the point in the mission. (6/10)Actor ReviewPaul Walker: Chris the son of the Professor who doesn't want to follow in his father's footsteps, but will drop everything to go on a mission to save his life, even though he should already be dead. Good performance from Walker showing his potential in an early role. (7/10)walkerFrances O'Connor: Kate one of the team who is determined to find something and will put her work before any relationship. Good performance but in the end is a very annoying character due to over reactions in the past. (6/10)francesGerard Butler: Andre a man with passion for the past, who risks more damage to what has happened when he tries to save Lady Claire from the fate she already suffered. Good performance from Butler who showed he was the action star of the future. (8/10)gerardBilly Connolly: Professor Johnston the man behind the dig who has put his career ahead of being a father to Chris, but he gets trapped in the past and calls for his team to risk their own lives to save him. Not the best from Connolly who looks lost a lot of the time, it didn't help that his character is the catalyst for everything that happened. (4/10)billyDavid Thewlis: Robert the brains behind the time travel operation who fails to tell the team all the risks but shows what he is made of during the story after the machine gets destroyed. Good business man role worrying more about covering himself than the people whose lives he is risking.(7/10)DavidAnna Friel: Lady Claire the lady whose death drove the French to victory but after she gets saved by Andre who is meant to be the motivation for the victory. Good performance pulling off the accents perfectly. (8/10)lady clareNeal McDonough: Frank the solider sent back to protect the team with his experience of previous trips, but he gets more than he has bargained for. Good performance in a supporting disposable character role. (6/10)nealDirector Review: Richard Donner – I think it would be fair to say this film was a little bit too ambitious to put to film without any real major stars at the time and a lot gets lost in translation. (6/10)Action: The battles sequences are big and full of plenty of action. (8/10)Sci-Fi: The different idea for time travel works really well, but still leaves plenty of questions. (7/10)Settings: Good authentic settings created for both past and present scenes. (9/10)Suggestion: This is one to try it is not brilliant but has some good ideas that don't quite come off but the effort should be given credit. (Try)Best Part: Andre character steals the show.Worst Part: Questionable reason for doing the traveling.Action Scene Of The Film: The final battle.Favourite Quote: 'So what you are saying, it that you accidentally discovered time travel'.Believability: No (0/10)Chances of Tears: No (0/10)Chances of Sequel: NoPost Credits Scene: NoOscar Chances: NoBox Office: $44 MillionBudget: $80 MillionRuntime: 1 Hour 56 MinutesTagline: One man's future lie in the past.Overall: Time Travel Film Lost In Time